Use the checklist supplied in the CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, as well as appropriate indices or indicators, and at least one other matrix, network, or checklist, to evaluate environmental impacts. Discuss separately any impacts that may or definitely will be significant. Take into account the Mandatory Findings of Significance under CEQA Guidelines (sec. 15065). This is a good place to use the indicators and indices studied in Assignment No. 3.
Determine which public agencies may have regulatory permit authority, and identify other agencies that may choose to advise or comment on the EIS/EIR you are preparing. Discuss the possible role of these agencies. Various agencies have thresholds of significance or other ways to determine if they will permit, comment or ignore a project.
Determine which public interest groups, business organizations, non-profit organizations, and other private partiesmay have an interest in the project studied in your EIS/EIR. Discuss their possible role: will they be consulted experts, will they simply be invited to review and comment the draft EIS/EIR? Indicate what means will be taken to contact those various parties.
Identify plans and policies with which the project must be consistent, such as zoning plans and other applicable land use controls. Sum up and discuss their requirements.
Note: Normally, an Initial Study or Environmental Assessment
requires the evaluation of all alternatives' impacts. At this stage
in your project, you do not have this information available. Complete
the IS/EA to the best of your current knowledge, clearly indicating what
information you have in hand and what is still missing. Since this
document examines impacts at a low level of resolution, it's acceptable
to have only conceptual outlines of the various alternatives.
Include at least:
This is not an exhaustive list but a minimum.
Hints: It may be useful to split the assignment by topic between team members, and exchange for peer review before turning in your assignment. If your Environmental Setting memorandum (Assignment No. 2) was satisfactory (i.e., needed only minor corrections), you can incorporate it directly by attaching it as an appendix. If, however, it needed serious rework, include a corrected version in your Initial Study/Environmental Assessment, with your original graded copy in appendix.
This is a team assignment. Turn in one copy for the entire team, making sure to list all team members.
Due date: Monday, March 22, 1999 (by 5:00 PM).